lirik lagu crawl across the sky – day 300: the tragedy of the commons
day 300: the tragedy of the commons [i]
i have been counting the days – i’m not entirely sure if each passing day is a small victory or whether it is another day in which the desire for life has held me captive
almost a year – and the more days i count, it seems to me, whether victor or captive, it is a losing hand in which we have been given
sorry, i’ve been given
what does it all matter if nothing i do will be seen or read or heard by anyone? if it will all end with no consequence?
it seems, also, that humans werе put between scylla and charybdis
if god knew all paths and ways of time, surеly he would have known that adam and eve would have plucked the forbidden fruit, long before he breathed life into their clay. [ii] [iii]
and thus humanity was on a spiral downward from the beginning
humans were social creatures – desiring to be loved and to love, to live and to bequeath life unto others. and it is that nature that d~mned us
we consumed and gave things that were not just ours, but our planet’s. we broke away from the natural cycle of life – encroaching on the territory of other mammals and populations, cultivating our own food supply, creating our cities. i don’t think it was a bad thing necessarily. but all we did was take – never give
those beautiful, intimate moments. the fragile nipple, the white linen sheets. we made love and decreased the mortality rate
so we bred like rats, fruitful and multiplying, multiplying far beyond our means of production
and we could not let our brothers and sisters die. we could not. [iv] [v] [vi][vii][viii]
we tried to feed ourselves and save ourselves, but all that did was cause more starvation and suffering
there was such little habitat for such a quantity of inhabitants. [ix]
so we quarreled and fought, waging wars, over more land, more economic resources, more food, to survive. we live pyrrhic lives. every last one of us. in extending our lives, we subjected ourselves to a living h~ll. and those few who had the means to drastically increase their quality of life and their lives sought to increase it for themselves, leaving behind only scr~ps of scr~ps for the many. [x]
they made themselves untouchable with their wealth. they made strong and lofty walls, both literal and socioeconomic. they sought to forget we existed outside the walls, with ample food and drink and entertainment
but all things are temporary, and no one escapes death
the mighty cried, “peace! safety!” but that day came like a thief in the night. their walls were felled beneath the weight of nuclear terror. [xi][xii]
and all died each in the despairing posture of their fall. and the hands of every clock folded. and darkness and decay and death held illimitable dominion over all
perhaps it was just as well
we would have consumed all the earth, and eventually ourselves
we would have made our environment too toxic to live in
we would have replaced our ocean waters with plastic and melted the icebergs to compensate
we would breathe smog more readily than steward the earth we were given
triune god, almighty father, son of man, holy spirit, was it worth creating humanity? did you love us when we razed and raped each other? did you remember us fondly like you do the grains of sand on the dead shores? was the good in our createdness worth all the pain and death? all the suffering? all the racism and inequality, the inhumane things we have wrought on each other? was it very good?
but now, nothing remains
escaping the decay of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare, this lonely vessel strides into the void, stretching far away. [xiii]
[i] (tragedy of the commons) https://www.britannica.com/science/tragedy~of~the~commons
[ii] prometheus unbound, percy bysshe sh~lley
[iii] first cause/cosmological argument for god
[iv] ishmael, daniel quinn
[v] i think it might be easy to interpret this as pro~ecofascism, but that is the exact opposite of what i want to express. the reality is that humans remain in a biosphere, interconnected with the organisms that surround us, often times creating artificial ecosystems, even more often artificial ecosystems that are detrimental to the organisms that find themselves in it. our current lifestyles create so much waste unnecessary devastation (plastic, trash, deforestation, etc.). as for food shortages and famine, i think wresting environmental control from big corporations that cause most of our pollution is a good start. there’s also a tendency (albeit that has lessened slowly) to simply give aid to countries who need it as opposed to give them the tools to be independent and self~sustaining. empowerment of our fellow humans must be key – we cannot be first~world saviors. we need to be more aware, also, as organisms in a delicate ecosystem who we depend on for our sustenance and what other predators we are hedging out in making our mark. that is not to say we are the same as other animals and should be treated as such – this mindset is an eco~fascist one and is unfair toward developing countries who don’t have a say (not by their choice, but by the choice of those who wield power). this mindset will only lead to shutting out aid for developing countries or culling precious human lives for the sake of “population control” and “lifeboat ethics,” which are not options up for debate at all. there can be no such thing in a world bent on human progress. there is no room for n~z~sm, fascism, racism, and genocide. we must not focus on individual and short~term profiting but collective preservation – meaning all of the human race
[vi] (climate change: atmospheric carbon dioxide) https://www.climate.gov/news~features/understanding~climate/climate~change~atmospheric~carbon~dioxide
[vii] (what are the greenhouse gas changes since the industrial revolution?) https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/climatescience/greenhousegases/industrialrevolution.html
[viii] (revealed: the 20 firms behind a third of all carbon emissions) https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/oct/09/revealed~20~firms~third~carbon~emissions
[ix] “we tried to feed ourselves and save ourselves, but all that did was cause more starvation and suffering./there was such little habitat for such a quantity of inhabitants.” the tragedy of the commons only exists is if the resource or resources in question are scarce or in the process of becoming scarce. the resources are being h~~rded for selfish governmental and corporate purposes by the few and wealthy. the tragedy of the commons is often ~n~logized as several ranchers with a grazing field that adds more cattle to the field to increase their profits. the few ranchers receive the benefit while the many cattle slowly starve. the cattle must break down the pens and become their own ranchers. the ranchers profit off of the cattle, and it is only fair that the cattle get their due
[x] the eco~fascists and the wealthy, the upper class
[xi] masque of the red death, edgar allen poe
[xii] the communist manifesto, marx, engles
[xiii] ozymandias, percy bysshe sh~lley
Lirik lagu lainnya:
- lirik lagu jo – iubirea mea
- lirik lagu ilymental – idkwts
- lirik lagu pabllo vittar – ponte perra (chediak & laysa remix)
- lirik lagu ghouljaboy – velada en hotel de costa n°7 ホテルの音楽
- lirik lagu rodionis – 12
- lirik lagu jordan solomon – 800 days
- lirik lagu not a meme – what u wanted
- lirik lagu bad bunny & abra – sorry papi
- lirik lagu young & sick – flowing over
- lirik lagu sirius – après minuit